It is our preference to have a Revenue Officer handling a client’s case as opposed to automated collections. When possible we request that a client’s case be transferred to local Revenue Officer. We also ask for this when a client’s case has been assigned to a Revenue Officer that is not geographically desirable. What I mean by this is I would rather have a Revenue Officer in New York or Los Angeles as the standards of living are much higher in these areas as compared to say, the Midwest. This typically equate to larger allowances for living expenses. And yes, transferring a case to a local Revenue Officer typically allows additional time to pass before the case is made active again.